Sunday, 28 June 2015

Six weeks of separation: The campaign rhetoric of the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats

Judi Atkins discusses the rhetoric of the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats in the 2015 general election, within the context of the previous Coalition government.

How do the former partners in a coalition government defend their record and, at the same time, reassert their distinctive identities? This process begins months before the general election, of course, but it intensifies during the short campaign and requires considerable rhetorical skill – especially for the smaller party, whose influence and achievements are often less visible to the public.  

David Cameron’s campaign rhetoric centred on the choice between competence and chaos. Drawing on the Conservatives’ reputation for sound economic management, he argued that his government’s policies were ‘getting the country on the right track’. Cameron marshalled factual evidence to support this, claiming they had created two million jobs and halved the deficit while maintaining investment in the NHS. He also invoked the narrative of the ‘fiscal mess’ the government had inherited and expressed his eagerness to ‘finish the job that we’ve all started’. Here Cameron recalled the ‘we’re all in this together’ mantra, with its echoes of the ‘Dunkirk spirit’, and so sought to unite the public behind his party in a shared mission. He thus projected an image of governing competence and strong leadership, while his acknowledgement that ‘it’s been a very difficult time’ implies that the sacrifices made to secure the recovery must not be allowed to go to waste.[1]   

Alongside this display of competence, Cameron fuelled fears of a minority Labour government held to ransom by the SNP. Again drawing on the deficit narrative, he warned of a ‘coalition of chaos’, with ‘the SNP acting as the chain to Labour’s wrecking ball, running right through our economic recovery’. Indeed, he continued, ‘it will be you who pays the price … with job losses, with massive tax rises, and an economy back on the brink of bankruptcy’.[2] The destruction metaphor heightened the emotional impact of Cameron’s words, and so enhanced the persuasive power of his claim that only a Conservative government would ensure the recovery continued. While the Party was criticised for a lacklustre campaign, the fusion of its economic narrative with the ‘politics of fear’ enabled it to confound expectations and win an overall majority.

The Liberal Democrats, meanwhile, emphasised their centrist credentials and their achievements in government. Thus, Nick Clegg expressed concern that the economic recovery would be threatened either by the Conservatives’ ‘ideological cuts’ or by Labour’s allegedly irresponsible borrowing, and argued that ‘we need to remain anchored in the centre ground so that we can finish the job of balancing the books, but do it fairly’.[3] To demonstrate the efficacy of this approach, he reminded the electorate that the Liberal Democrats had, for instance, raised the income tax threshold and introduced the Pupil Premium, and so had helped to ‘create a stronger economy and a fairer society’. Indeed, if given the opportunity to act as kingmaker in a subsequent coalition, the Liberal Democrats would ‘add a heart to a Conservative government and a brain to a Labour one’.[4] Rather like the Wizard of Oz, Clegg’s party would give their potential partners the qualities they needed to govern well, but which they currently lacked.

Although the Liberal Democrats’ belief in fairness was at the forefront of their 2010 campaign, it was soon subordinated to the Conservatives’ deficit reduction strategy. In 2015 the Party revived this commitment in a bid to re-establish their distinctive identity, while appealing to their audience’s sense of justice. To this end, they prioritised deficit reduction on the ground that it is unfair to burden future generations with the debt, and sought to distance themselves from the Conservatives’ approach. In particular, Clegg criticised their proposed £12 billion reduction in welfare spending as ‘very unfair’, asking Cameron: ‘What are you going to do? Who are you going to hurt? Who’s going to bear the pain?’.[5] However, this attack failed to convince due to the Liberal Democrat leadership’s capitulation to the Conservatives’ austerity programme, while Clegg’s efforts to present himself as a principled politician sat uneasily with his U-turns on tuition fees and the ‘bedroom tax’. These apparent contradictions gravely undermined the Liberal Democrats’ credibility and were surely a key factor in their crushing defeat on 7 May.

Judi Atkins is Lecturer in Politics at Coventry University. She is author of Justifying New Labour Policy (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011) and co-editor of Rhetoric in British Politics and Society (Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).

This post is reproduced from UK Election Analysis 2015: Media, Voters and the Campaign, edited by Daniel Jackson and Einar Thorsen and published by the Centre for Study of Journalism, Culture and Community at Bournemouth University, in partnership with the Political Studies Association.

Featuring 71 articles from 92 leading UK academics, this special publication captures the immediate thoughts, reflections and early research insights on the 2015 UK General Election from the cutting edge of media and politics research.

Published ten days after the election, these contributions are short and accessible. Authors provide authoritative analysis of the campaign, including research findings or new theoretical insights; to bring readers original ways of understanding the election. Contributions also bring a rich range of disciplinary influences, from political science to fan studies, journalism studies to advertising. See the Election Analysis website for more details.

[1] ITV (2015) The ITV Leaders’ Debate (UK General Election 2015), 2 April.
[2] Cameron, David (2015) Speech Launching Scottish Manifesto, 16 April.
[3] BBC (2015) Question Time – Election Leaders Special, 30 April.
[4] Clegg, Nick (2015) Speech Launching the Liberal Democrat Manifesto, 15 April.
[5] BBC (2015) Question Time – Election Leaders Special, 30 April.


  1. Istikhara kya ha or ais ka maksad kya ha? Kya kabhi ap ma sa kisi na socha ha. Aj hum ap ko Istikhara +923244544864 ha asal maksad btayan ga. Istikhara asal ma kisi kam ko shuru karna sa pala Allah ki raza jannna ha.
    Online Istikhara
    Free online Rohani ilaj
    Online Istikhara for Marriage
    Dua Istikhara for marriage in Urdu
    Free online rohani Wazaif
    Free taweez online
    Online Marriage Istikhara Service
    Love Marriage Problems
    Nori ilm

  2. Aj hum ap ko istikhara ka asal maksad or aus ki hamiyat k bara ma btata hain. Istikhara ka asal maksad koi b kam shuru karna sa pala Allah talah k raza janna hoti ha +923055381273. Online Istikhara 1 asi wahai service ha j ap dunya k kisi b kona ma istamal kar sakta hain.
    Online Istikhara
    Free Rohani ilaj
    Rohani ilaj
    Love Marriage Problem
    Taweez and Nori ilm
    Istikhara for marriage